“Hate speech” is the new “you’re a raaaaacist!”

Whatever they can do to try to shut you up. Keep in mind, last night I said that I question the faith of anyone who would say hallelujah on Sunday and then go vote for a dude who is pro-abortion on Monday. Apparently, it’s “hate” to point out contradictions.

Hi Dana,

Heard your show last night for the first time and wanted to congratulate you on your rise. You have the character of a Hate radio DJ down pat. The inflection, the outrage, even the word choices were top notch. You have mastered this role.

I tuned in while you were ranting about Liberalism in education and liberalism in the church. Was totally blown away to find out you were talking about SLU, a school most would consider ‘Conservative’ to say the least, but you made it sound like a bastion of free thinking liberal thought.

Your continued rise in this arena will be fun to watch. You have the aggression, the looks, and the vocab to go far in ‘Hate broadcasting’ and right wing idolatry. Do be careful though, one day the outrage you urge in others will turn to violence and innocent people will die in your name. This is assured. That is a lot to live with, even when one has Religious righteousness and a fervent belief in their absolute rightness. I hope when that day comes you can live with the results of what you have sown.

Once again, Congratulations on your success,
Steve Truesdell

Again, remarking on false prophets, preachers who hide behind the pulpit and cheat on their wives or milk people of money <cough>Benny Hinn</cough>; calling out people who market an academic institution as a religious entity while accommodating a dude who said that the Holocaust was just one giant hustle, that’s “hate speech.” I guess he’s OK with all of that. Dude, what a twisted world in which we live.

Speaking of violence, what does he think of this violence? Or this violence? Or this? This? This? What does he think of the government calling out muscle to rough up protesters? Oh, he’s OK with that, I suppose, because it’s for things with which he agrees. Hippie FAIL. You can’t be for the government for one issue and against it for the same issue when the only variable that’s changed is the party in power.

He’s parroting Pelosi with this Helter Skelter nonsense; it’s like they WANT violence to take place, they WANT people to be hurt. It’s all they talk of and yet THEY are the ones propagating it at the town halls, at protests, at summits. Reality bites.